Overall Summary

Key Aspects Impacting Performance and Conversions

This summarised analysis highlights the crucial elements affecting the performance and conversion rates of the website. By addressing these areas, the site can achieve enhanced speed, user engagement, and search engine visibility.

Key Findings

1. Image Optimisation: Efficient encoding and transitioning to modern formats like WebP can significantly reduce load times and data use, enhancing user experience.

2. JavaScript Management: Streamlining JavaScript execution and reducing unused scripts can save substantial resources and improve load performance.

3. Render-Blocking Resources: Eliminating or deferring these resources can lead to faster initial rendering, improving user perception of site speed.

4. Caching Strategies: Implementing effective cache policies can enhance speed for repeat visitors and reduce server load.

5. SEO Improvements: Addressing duplicate content and metadata issues can boost search engine rankings and visibility.

6. Content Quality: Increasing the depth and relevance of content can improve user engagement and page authority.

7. Responsive Design: Ensuring a seamless mobile experience through responsive design can expand reach and improve user satisfaction.

8. Technical SEO: Fixing broken links and optimising metadata can improve crawl efficiency and user navigation.

9. Security Measures: Implementing SSL/TLS and maintaining up-to-date software can enhance site security and user trust.

10. Performance Monitoring: Using analytics and monitoring tools to track performance and user behaviour can guide ongoing optimisations and strategy adjustments.

By focusing on these areas, the website can expect to see improvements in load times, user experience, and conversion rates, ultimately driving more traffic and engagement.

Get full report

Overall Performance Review

Desktop Speed Performance Results
A
B
C
Mobile Speed Performance Results
A
B
C
Domain Rating Results
A
B
C
A
Industry Standard
B
Era Group Landing Page Performance
C
Growthlabs Clients

SEO Overview Statistics

Total Ranked Keywords
67
Keywords in #1 Position
1
Keywords in #2-3 Position
0
Keywords in #4 - #10 Position
4
Estimated Traffic Value
$305.04
Highest Search Volume
480
Top Ranked Keyword
era group
Total Search Volume
0

Overall Website Statistics

Valid SSL Certificate
Canonicalization Test Passed
WWW Redirect Test Passed
4XX Errors
1
External Links
4475
Internal Links
2461
Broken Links
1
Duplicate Titles
0
Duplicate Descriptions
12
Duplicate Content Instances
9
Pages Without Descriptions
0
Title Too Long
25
Title Too Short
5
Redirect Loops
0
5XX Errors
0
Broken Resources
0
SEO-Friendly URL Checks Passed
74
SEO-Friendly URL Keywords Check
74
Images With Missing Alt Attributes
75
Images Missing Image Titles
75
Summary Report on Website Performance

The website performance evaluation reveals several opportunities for optimisation, particularly concerning image handling, JavaScript management, and overall load efficiency. Key metrics like Largest Contentful Paint and Time to Interactive indicate room for improvement to enhance user experience and reduce load times. By implementing the following recommendations, the website can achieve faster loading speeds and improved performance.

Detailed Analysis and Recommendations
Efficiently Encode Images

Optimising image encoding can reduce load times and data usage. The potential savings of 10 KiB suggest that reviewing image compression and formats could enhance page speed. Consider using next-gen formats like WebP for additional savings.

Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)

The LCP is recorded at 2,120 ms, which is a critical metric for user experience. To improve this, consider optimising images and ensuring that the largest visible elements load quickly. Reducing render-blocking resources will also aid in improving LCP times.

Descriptive Link Text

Three links lack descriptive text, which can hinder SEO performance and accessibility. Ensure all links include descriptive text to improve search engine understanding and user navigation.

Eliminate Render-Blocking Resources

Potential savings of 290 ms can be achieved by minimising render-blocking resources. Inline critical CSS and defer non-essential JavaScript to expedite the initial rendering process.

First Contentful Paint (FCP)

The FCP of 0.8 seconds is satisfactory; however, there is room for further improvement by optimising the delivery of critical resources and reducing server response times.

Efficient Cache Policy

Implementing a long cache TTL for 87 resources can enhance repeat visit speeds. This will reduce server load and improve load times for returning users.

Reduce Unused JavaScript

With potential savings of 4,100 KiB, reducing unused JavaScript is crucial. Defer loading scripts until necessary and consider tree shaking to eliminate dead code.

Speed Index

A Speed Index of 5.9 seconds indicates a need for faster visible content rendering. Optimise stylesheets, scripts, and images to improve this metric.

Minify JavaScript and CSS

Minifying JavaScript could save 331 KiB, while minifying CSS could save 137 KiB. This will reduce payload sizes and improve parsing times, thus enhancing load speed.

Reduce JavaScript Execution Time

The execution time of 7.8 seconds is excessive. Streamline JavaScript by reducing payload sizes and simplifying code logic to minimise parse, compile, and execution times.

Time to Interactive (TTI)

The TTI of 13.1 seconds is high, indicating a delay in full interactivity. Improve this by optimising scripts, reducing third-party code impact, and deferring offscreen content.

Third-Party Code Impact

Third-party code blocked the main thread for 2,590 ms. Limit the use of third-party scripts and load them asynchronously to prevent interference with the main thread.

Avoid Excessive DOM Size

With 1,452 elements, the DOM size is excessive, leading to increased memory usage and slower rendering. Simplify the DOM and avoid unnecessary elements.

Avoid Enormous Network Payloads

The total size of 14,388 KiB is substantial. Compress assets, leverage caching, and optimise resources to reduce the payload size for faster load times.

Modern Image Formats

Switching to formats like WebP could save 4,135 KiB, significantly enhancing load speed and reducing data consumption.

Minimize Main-Thread Work

At 10.3 seconds, main-thread work is a bottleneck. Reduce JavaScript complexity and optimise style calculations to alleviate this issue.

Conclusion

By focusing on these key areas—image optimisation, JavaScript management, and resource loading strategies—the website can significantly improve its performance metrics. Implementing these recommendations will lead to faster load times, enhanced user experience, and better search engine visibility.

Get full report

Current Website Issues

Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data. [Learn how to efficiently encode images](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/uses-optimized-images/).
This is the largest contentful element painted within the viewport. [Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint element](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/lighthouse-largest-contentful-paint/)
Descriptive link text helps search engines understand your content. [Learn how to make links more accessible](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/seo/link-text/).
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles. [Learn how to eliminate render-blocking resources](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/render-blocking-resources/).
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. [Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/first-contentful-paint/).
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. [Learn more about efficient cache policies](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/uses-long-cache-ttl/).
Reduce unused JavaScript and defer loading scripts until they are required to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn how to reduce unused JavaScript](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unused-javascript/).
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. [Learn more about the Speed Index metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/speed-index/).
Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time. [Learn how to minify JavaScript](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unminified-javascript/).
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. [Learn how to reduce Javascript execution time](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/bootup-time/).
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. [Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/interactive/).
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. [Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/third-party-facades/).
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. [Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/lighthouse-largest-contentful-paint/)
A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer [style calculations](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/rendering/reduce-the-scope-and-complexity-of-style-calculations), and produce costly [layout reflows](https://developers.google.com/speed/articles/reflow). [Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/dom-size/).
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. [Learn how to reduce payload sizes](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/total-byte-weight/).
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. For your bundled JavaScript, adopt a modern script deployment strategy using module/nomodule feature detection to reduce the amount of code shipped to modern browsers, while retaining support for legacy browsers. [Learn how to use modern JavaScript](https://web.dev/articles/publish-modern-javascript)
Reduce unused rules from stylesheets and defer CSS not used for above-the-fold content to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn how to reduce unused CSS](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unused-css-rules/).
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. [Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/lighthouse-total-blocking-time/).
Image formats like WebP and AVIF often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption. [Learn more about modern image formats](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/uses-webp-images/).
Chrome is moving towards a new experience that allows users to choose to browse without third-party cookies. [Learn more about third-party cookies](https://developers.google.com/privacy-sandbox/cookies).
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. [Learn how to minimize third-party impact](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/optimizing-content-efficiency/loading-third-party-javascript/).
Minifying CSS files can reduce network payload sizes. [Learn how to minify CSS](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unminified-css/).
Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive. [Learn how to defer offscreen images](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/offscreen-images/).
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. [Learn how to minimize main-thread work](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/mainthread-work-breakdown/)
Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time. [Learn how to size images](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/uses-responsive-images/).
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. [Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/lighthouse-max-potential-fid/).

Techical SEO Report

Overall Feedback Summary

The technical SEO analysis of the domain *en.eragroup.com* reveals a generally strong performance with an on-page score of 93.59. The site benefits from valid SSL certification, lacks any major crawl errors, and fully supports HTTP/2, which are positive indicators of a well-maintained infrastructure. However, there are several areas that require attention, particularly concerning duplicate metadata, content issues, and some long titles. Addressing these will enhance the site’s accessibility, user experience, and search engine visibility.

Key Issues and Recommendations
Duplicate Descriptions
    • Impact: Duplicate meta descriptions can confuse search engines, leading to improper indexing and ranking of pages.
    • Specific Fixes: Review and update the 12 pages with duplicate meta descriptions to ensure each has a unique, descriptive, and keyword-rich summary of the page content.
Duplicate Content
    • Impact: Duplicate content can cause search engines to struggle in deciding which version of content is most relevant for a given query, potentially diluting page authority.
    • Specific Fixes: Identify the sources of duplication across the 9 pages and consolidate or differentiate the content as needed. Consider using canonical tags to inform search engines about the preferred versions.
Title Length Issues
    • Impact: Titles that are either too long or too short can negatively impact click-through rates and search engine rankings.
    • Specific Fixes: For the 25 pages with titles that are too long, shorten them to within 50-60 characters while maintaining keyword relevance. For the 5 titles that are too short, expand them to provide more context and include relevant keywords.
Broken Links
    • Impact: Broken links disrupt user experience and can lead to crawling issues, affecting the site’s SEO health.
    • Specific Fixes: Locate and fix the single broken link to ensure it points to a valid, active URL or remove it if no longer necessary.
Low Content Rate
    • Impact: A low content rate can imply that pages lack sufficient information to satisfy user queries or search engine requirements, potentially impacting rankings.
    • Specific Fixes: Enhance content on the affected pages by adding relevant information, images, or videos to increase engagement and comprehensiveness.
Missing Alt Text for Images
    • Impact: Missing alternative text for images can lead to accessibility issues and reduce the site’s search engine friendliness as it limits context for indexing.
    • Specific Fixes: Add descriptive and keyword-rich alt text to the 75 images lacking it to improve accessibility and SEO.
Missing Image Titles
    • Impact: Images without titles miss an opportunity to provide additional context and potentially improve search visibility.
    • Specific Fixes: Incorporate meaningful and concise titles for the 75 images to enhance user experience and SEO.
Canonicalisation Issues
    • Impact: Without proper canonicalisation, search engines may index duplicate or irrelevant pages, which can dilute ranking signals.
    • Specific Fixes: Implement correct canonical tags to guide search engines to the preferred versions of the content.
Deprecated HTML Tags
    • Impact: Use of deprecated HTML tags can lead to rendering issues across different browsers and devices, affecting user experience.
    • Specific Fixes: Replace deprecated tags with current standard HTML tags to ensure consistent rendering and support across platforms.
Additional Observations
  • SSL Certificate: The SSL certificate is valid and issued by a reputable authority, ensuring secure connections for users.
  • Sitemap and Robots.txt: Both are present and functional, which helps guide search engine crawlers effectively.
  • HTTPS & HTTP2: The site supports HTTPS and HTTP2, providing secure and fast browsing experiences.
Conclusion

While *en.eragroup.com* is predominantly well-optimised, addressing the highlighted issues will further strengthen its technical SEO posture. Prioritising the resolution of duplicate content and metadata, fixing broken links, and enhancing image attributes are key steps towards improving search visibility and user satisfaction.

Get full report

Tech Stack Report

Summary

The website’s technology stack could not be assessed due to the absence of available data for the specified domain. Despite this, there are general recommendations and best practices for optimising a website’s technology stack. These include ensuring up-to-date technologies, enhancing performance, and improving security measures. Below are some recommendations that can be considered to enhance the website’s overall performance, security, and user experience.

Recommendations for Technology Stack Improvements
1. Web Hosting and Server Configuration
    • Optimise Server Performance: Ensure that the server has adequate resources such as CPU, RAM, and storage to handle expected traffic loads. Consider using a Content Delivery Network (CDN) to reduce latency and improve load times for global users.
    • Scalability: Use cloud hosting solutions that offer scalability options to handle traffic spikes efficiently.
2. Frontend Technologies
    • Responsive Design: Employ a responsive design framework such as Bootstrap or Foundation to ensure the website is mobile-friendly and provides a seamless experience across all devices.
    • JavaScript Libraries: Utilise modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks like React, Angular, or Vue.js for dynamic and interactive user interfaces.
3. Backend Technologies
    • Framework and Language: Depending on the project requirements, consider using modern and widely supported backend frameworks such as Node.js, Django, or Laravel. Ensure the programming language is updated to its latest stable version.
    • Database Management: Evaluate the use of relational databases like MySQL or PostgreSQL or NoSQL databases like MongoDB based on data structure and scalability needs.
4. Security Enhancements
    • SSL/TLS: Implement SSL/TLS certificates to ensure data encryption between the server and clients.
    • Regular Updates: Keep all software, including CMS, plugins, and server software, updated to the latest versions to patch known vulnerabilities.
    • Web Application Firewall (WAF): Consider using a WAF to protect against common web threats such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS).
5. SEO and Performance Optimisation
    • Page Speed: Utilise tools like PageSpeed Insights to identify issues affecting load times and follow best practices to optimise images, minify CSS and JavaScript, and leverage browser caching.
    • Structured Data: Implement structured data using schema.org tags to improve search engine understanding and visibility.
6. Analytics and Monitoring
  • Analytics Tools: Integrate analytics tools such as Google Analytics or Matomo to track user behaviour and website performance.
  • Error Monitoring: Use monitoring services to detect and resolve errors or downtime promptly.

By incorporating these general improvements and keeping the technology stack up-to-date, the website can achieve better performance, security, and user satisfaction.

Get full report

SEO Report

Summary

This report provides an analysis of the SEO strengths and weaknesses based on the given data. It covers keyword rankings, search volume, competition, and estimated traffic value (ETV). By examining these metrics, we can identify the most effective strategies to enhance SEO performance.

Keyword Rankings
    • Total Ranked Keywords: 67
    • Position 1 Keywords: 1
    • Position 2-3 Keywords: 0
    • Position 4-10 Keywords: 4
    • Position 11-20 Keywords: 12
    • Position 21-50 Keywords: 26
    • Position 50+ Keywords: 24

The keyword “era group” is the only keyword ranked at position 1, indicating a strong presence for this term. However, there are no keywords ranked in positions 2-3, suggesting a potential area for improvement in securing high-value positions.

Search Volume and Competition
    • Highest Search Volume: 480 for the keyword “era group”
    • Average Competition: 0

The keyword “era group” not only ranks first but also has the highest search volume, making it a critical asset. The average competition is low, suggesting an opportunity to improve rankings for other keywords with relatively minimal resistance.

Estimated Traffic Value (ETV)
    • Total ETV: 305.04

This metric indicates the potential traffic value that the current keyword rankings can generate. With a total ETV of approximately 305, there is room to enhance traffic through targeted keyword strategies.

Top Performing Keywords
  • Top Ranked Keyword: “era group”
  • Keywords with CPC > $1: 25

The keyword “era group” is the top performer, both in rank and search volume. Additionally, 25 keywords have a cost-per-click (CPC) greater than $1, indicating their potential profitability.

Strategic Recommendations

1. Focus on High-Value Keywords: Prioritise improving the rankings of keywords currently in positions 11-20, as these have the potential to break into the top 10 with targeted efforts.

2. Leverage Low Competition: With the average competition being low, there is a strategic opportunity to optimise content and metadata for keywords with higher search volumes.

3. Increase Content Quality and Relevance: To improve rankings, ensure that the content surrounding these keywords is highly relevant and of superior quality, addressing user intent effectively.

4. Monitor Keyword Performance: Regularly track changes in keyword performance, search volume, and competition to adjust strategies dynamically and maintain a competitive edge.

By implementing these strategies, there is significant potential to enhance the visibility and effectiveness of SEO campaigns, thereby increasing traffic and engagement on the site.

Get full report

Want to know what your competitors are doing?

How do you compare to your competitors?
Get detailed market knowledge with a Competitor Insight review. See where you stand and the opportunities where you can out-perform. Identify the strengths and weaknesses of your competitor websites and take away a plan for gaining valuable search traffic.

We can only provide a limited number of Competitor Insight reviews so click below to request access to this invaluable analysis.

A Growthlabs Competitor Insight review includes:
Detailed analysis of your top 5 competitors
Review discussion with member of the Growthlabs team
Recommendations and an action plan
Only 20 Deep Dive reviews available.
Request Competitor Insight
How do you compare to competitors?
Get Competitor Insight
Curious how you stack up against your competitors?
Get a Competitor Insight review from Growthlabs to see where you stand, uncover key opportunities, and walk away with a clear plan to gain valuable search traffic. Limited to just 20 reviews—complete the form below to request yours.