Overall Summary

Introduction

The following summary outlines the key aspects of a comprehensive analysis on website performance, technical SEO, SEO performance, and technology stack. The report is structured to highlight the most impactful elements that could boost both performance and conversions.

Key Findings

1. Page Load Times: Optimising images and reducing render-blocking resources can significantly decrease load times, enhancing user experience and engagement.

2. Meta Descriptions: Adding unique meta descriptions to pages without them can improve click-through rates from search engine results.

3. Title Optimisation: Titles should be adjusted to optimal lengths to prevent truncation and improve search visibility, thereby enhancing user engagement.

4. Content Enhancement: Increasing the content richness on pages with low content rates can improve perception by search engines and user experience.

5. Image Attributes: Adding alt text and titles to images is crucial for SEO and accessibility, improving search engine understanding and user experience.

6. Keyword Strategy: Focus on optimising keywords ranked between positions 21-50, as these present opportunities for increased visibility and traffic gains.

7. Backlink Acquisition: A targeted strategy for acquiring backlinks can enhance domain authority, improving keyword rankings.

8. Security Enhancements: Implementing security headers and ensuring proper SSL/TLS configuration can protect against vulnerabilities and build user trust.

9. Caching and Compression: Using a Content Delivery Network (CDN) and enabling compression like GZIP or Brotli can reduce latency and improve global load times.

10. Regular Updates and Reviews: Keeping WordPress core, themes, plugins, and PHP versions updated is essential for maintaining security, performance, and compatibility.

Implementing these recommendations can lead to substantial improvements in website performance, search visibility, and user satisfaction, ultimately driving higher conversion rates.

Get full report

Overall Performance Review

Desktop Speed Performance Results
A
B
C
Mobile Speed Performance Results
A
B
C
Domain Rating Results
A
B
C
A
Industry Standard
B
Prodtex Performance
C
Growthlabs Clients

SEO Overview Statistics

Total Ranked Keywords
9
Keywords in #1 Position
0
Keywords in #2-3 Position
0
Keywords in #4 - #10 Position
1
Estimated Traffic Value
$8.1
Highest Search Volume
0
Top Ranked Keyword
Total Search Volume
0

Overall Website Statistics

Valid SSL Certificate
Canonicalization Test Passed
WWW Redirect Test Passed
4XX Errors
0
External Links
1105
Internal Links
1780
Broken Links
0
Duplicate Titles
0
Duplicate Descriptions
0
Duplicate Content Instances
4
Pages Without Descriptions
61
Title Too Long
10
Title Too Short
16
Redirect Loops
0
5XX Errors
0
Broken Resources
1
SEO-Friendly URL Checks Passed
58
SEO-Friendly URL Keywords Check
61
Images With Missing Alt Attributes
43
Images Missing Image Titles
62
Summary

The website’s performance can be significantly improved by addressing several key areas. Current performance metrics indicate that the page load times and user interaction times are longer than ideal, primarily due to inefficient handling of resources, image formats, and JavaScript. Below are detailed insights and recommendations that, when implemented, could enhance the website’s speed and user experience.

Key Performance Metrics
Speed Index: 2.7 s
    • The Speed Index is the time taken for the visible parts of the page to load. At 2.7 seconds, this suggests that users may experience noticeable delays before the page content is fully displayed.
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP): 2.0 s
    • LCP measures when the largest content element becomes visible. At 2.0 seconds, this is within an acceptable range but could be improved for a faster user experience.
Max Potential First Input Delay: 240 ms
    • This measures the delay users might face before interacting with the page. At 240 milliseconds, it is below the threshold of 300 milliseconds, thus considered acceptable.
Time to Interactive: 3.2 s
    • This is the time taken for the page to become fully interactive. A 3.2-second delay could hinder user engagement, suggesting room for improvement.
Total Blocking Time: 710 ms
    • The cumulative time when the main thread was blocked is 710 milliseconds, which indicates potential performance issues that need addressing.
Recommendations
Serve Images in Next-Gen Formats
    • Switching to modern image formats like WebP or AVIF could save approximately 2,827 KiB, reducing download times and improving page load speed.
Eliminate Render-Blocking Resources
    • Render-blocking resources delay the loading of visible content. Consider inlining critical CSS and deferring non-essential JavaScript to save around 550 milliseconds.
Avoid Serving Legacy JavaScript to Modern Browsers
    • Adopting a modern JavaScript bundling strategy could save 9 KiB and enhance performance by reducing unnecessary polyfills and transforms.
Efficiently Encode Images
    • Optimizing image size and format could save an additional 15 KiB, reducing load times and data usage.
Properly Size Images
    • Ensure images are appropriately sized for the display context to save 2,793 KiB, improving load times.
Reduce Unused JavaScript and CSS
    • Reducing unused JavaScript could save 653 KiB, while trimming unused CSS could save 159 KiB, both contributing to faster loading and execution times.
Enable Text Compression
    • Implementing text compression techniques like gzip or brotli could save 7 KiB, reducing the size of text-based resources.
Minimize Main-Thread Work
    • Reducing JavaScript execution time (currently 1.7 seconds) and minimizing main-thread work (3.1 seconds) will significantly enhance page responsiveness.
Use HTTPS
    • Transitioning to HTTPS will secure data transmission and is a fundamental requirement for modern web standards.
Reduce the Impact of Third-Party Code
    • Limiting and optimising third-party scripts could reduce their 670 ms blocking time, freeing up resources for primary content.
Serve Static Assets with Efficient Cache Policies
    • Implementing long-term caching for static resources can speed up repeat visits, enhancing user experience.
Additional Considerations
  • Avoid Enormous Network Payloads: With a total size of 6,100 KiB, reducing the payload size is crucial to improving load times.
  • Avoid Multiple Page Redirects: Cutting down on redirects can save 190 ms of loading time, streamlining user navigation.

Implementing these recommendations will help improve the website’s performance, offering a faster, more seamless user experience.

Get full report

Current Website Issues

Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. [Learn more about the Speed Index metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/speed-index/).
Image formats like WebP and AVIF often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption. [Learn more about modern image formats](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/uses-webp-images/).
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles. [Learn how to eliminate render-blocking resources](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/render-blocking-resources/).
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. For your bundled JavaScript, adopt a modern script deployment strategy using module/nomodule feature detection to reduce the amount of code shipped to modern browsers, while retaining support for legacy browsers. [Learn how to use modern JavaScript](https://web.dev/articles/publish-modern-javascript)
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. [Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/lighthouse-max-potential-fid/).
Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data. [Learn how to efficiently encode images](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/uses-optimized-images/).
Descriptive link text helps search engines understand your content. [Learn how to make links more accessible](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/seo/link-text/).
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. [Learn how to minimize main-thread work](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/mainthread-work-breakdown/)
Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time. [Learn how to size images](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/uses-responsive-images/).
Reduce unused JavaScript and defer loading scripts until they are required to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn how to reduce unused JavaScript](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unused-javascript/).
This is the largest contentful element painted within the viewport. [Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint element](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/lighthouse-largest-contentful-paint/)
All sites should be protected with HTTPS, even ones that don't handle sensitive data. This includes avoiding [mixed content](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/security/prevent-mixed-content/what-is-mixed-content), where some resources are loaded over HTTP despite the initial request being served over HTTPS. HTTPS prevents intruders from tampering with or passively listening in on the communications between your app and your users, and is a prerequisite for HTTP/2 and many new web platform APIs. [Learn more about HTTPS](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/pwa/is-on-https/).
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. [Learn how to minimize third-party impact](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/optimizing-content-efficiency/loading-third-party-javascript/).
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. [Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/interactive/).
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. [Learn how to reduce payload sizes](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/total-byte-weight/).
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. [Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/lighthouse-largest-contentful-paint/)
Reduce unused rules from stylesheets and defer CSS not used for above-the-fold content to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn how to reduce unused CSS](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unused-css-rules/).
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. [Learn more about efficient cache policies](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/uses-long-cache-ttl/).
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. [Learn how to reduce Javascript execution time](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/bootup-time/).
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. [Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/first-contentful-paint/).
Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time. [Learn how to minify JavaScript](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unminified-javascript/).
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. [Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/lighthouse-total-blocking-time/).
Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded. [Learn how to avoid page redirects](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/redirects/).
Text-based resources should be served with compression (gzip, deflate or brotli) to minimize total network bytes. [Learn more about text compression](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/uses-text-compression/).

Techical SEO Report

Technical SEO Report: prodtex.com
Overall Feedback Summary

The technical SEO analysis of prodtex.com indicates a well-structured website with a high on-page score of 95.11. While several areas perform well, there are critical issues related to meta descriptions, HTML tags, and image attributes that need addressing to optimise search engine visibility and user experience.

Crawl Overview
    • Crawl Status: Completed successfully with no errors.
    • Pages Crawled: 81 out of a maximum of 100.
    • SSL Certificate: Valid until 28 January 2025.
    • Server Information: WordPress version 6.6.2, running on OpenResty.
Key Issues Identified

1. Missing Meta Descriptions:

    • Impact: Reduces click-through rates from search engine results as users lack a preview of the page’s content.
    • Fix: Add unique and concise meta descriptions to the 61 pages lacking this element.

2. Title Length Issues:

    • Titles Too Long: 10 pages
    • Impact: May get truncated in search results, leading to incomplete information.
    • Fix: Shorten titles to an optimal length of 50-60 characters.
    • Titles Too Short: 16 pages
    • Impact: May lack essential keywords, affecting SEO performance.
    • Fix: Expand titles to include relevant keywords and provide context.

3. Low Content Rate (58 pages):

    • Impact: Pages with insufficient content may be perceived as low quality by search engines.
    • Fix: Enhance content with additional information and relevant keywords.

4. Missing <h1> Tags:

    • Pages Affected: 12
    • Impact: <h1> tags are crucial for defining the main topic of a page and improving accessibility.
    • Fix: Ensure each page has a single, clearly defined <h1> tag.

5. Missing Image Attributes:

    • Missing Alt Text: 43 images
    • Missing Image Titles: 62 images
    • Impact: Affects SEO and accessibility; search engines and screen readers rely on these attributes to understand image content.
    • Fix: Add descriptive alt text and titles to all images.

6. HTTPS to HTTP Links:

    • Links Affected: 60
    • Impact: Can lead to security warnings and negatively impact user trust and SEO.
    • Fix: Ensure all internal and external links use HTTPS.

7. Broken Resources:

    • Count: 1
    • Impact: Broken resources can lead to negative user experience and incomplete page rendering.
    • Fix: Identify and repair or remove the broken resource.
Additional Observations
  • Duplicate Content: Detected in 4 instances, which could lead to potential SEO penalties. Consolidate or differentiate these contents to avoid duplication.
  • SEO-Friendly URLs: 58 checks indicate non-compliance with SEO best practices. Ensure URLs are concise, descriptive, and include relevant keywords.
  • High Waiting Time: Noted on 1 page, which could affect user experience and site performance. Optimise server response time.
Conclusion

The technical SEO health of prodtex.com is robust, but addressing the highlighted issues will significantly enhance search engine performance and user experience. Priority should be given to resolving missing meta descriptions, optimising title lengths, and improving image attributes. Regular audits and updates will ensure continued compliance with SEO best practices.

Get full report

Tech Stack Report

Summary

The website employs a robust technology stack centred around WordPress, utilising OpenResty and Nginx for web serving, alongside MySQL for database management. It leverages PHP for server-side programming and employs WP Fastest Cache to enhance performance. While the current setup is efficient, there are opportunities for optimisation in terms of security, scalability, and performance. Recommendations include enhancing security measures, considering server and caching improvements, and evaluating database optimisation strategies.

Detailed Assessment
Web Servers
    • Current Technologies: OpenResty, Nginx
    • Recommendations:
    • Security: Implement security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP) and HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to protect against common vulnerabilities.
    • Load Balancing: If not already in use, consider implementing load balancing techniques to distribute incoming traffic efficiently and enhance fault tolerance.
Performance
    • Current Technologies: WP Fastest Cache
    • Recommendations:
    • Advanced Caching: Consider integrating a Content Delivery Network (CDN) to reduce latency and enhance load times globally.
    • Compression: Ensure that GZIP or Brotli compression is enabled to minimise data transfer size.
Reverse Proxies
    • Current Technologies: Nginx
    • Recommendations:
    • Enhance Security: Implement rate limiting and request filtering to protect against DDoS attacks.
    • SSL/TLS Configuration: Ensure that SSL/TLS is configured properly for secure data transmission.
Databases
    • Current Technologies: MySQL
    • Recommendations:
    • Optimisation: Regularly perform database optimisation tasks such as indexing, query optimisation, and cleaning up unused data to improve performance.
    • Scalability: Consider implementing a database replication strategy to improve availability and reliability.
WordPress Plugins
    • Current Technologies: WP Fastest Cache
    • Recommendations:
    • Review Plugins: Regularly review and update plugins to ensure they are essential, up-to-date, and compatible with the current WordPress version.
    • Security: Monitor for vulnerabilities and apply security patches promptly.
Content Management System
    • Current Technologies: WordPress
    • Recommendations:
    • Regular Updates: Keep the WordPress core, themes, and plugins updated to the latest versions to protect against security vulnerabilities.
    • Customisation: Consider customising the <head> and <body> tags to minimise the loading of unnecessary scripts and styles.
Programming Languages
  • Current Technologies: PHP
  • Recommendations:
  • Version Upgrade: Ensure that PHP is upgraded to the latest stable version to benefit from performance improvements and security patches.
  • Code Review: Conduct regular code reviews to ensure adherence to best practices and to optimise for performance and security.

By implementing these enhancements, the website can achieve improved security, performance, and scalability, ultimately providing a better experience for users.

Get full report

SEO Report

Summary

This technical report provides an analysis of the SEO performance, focusing on rankings, keywords, backlinks, and strategies. The analysis reveals that the website has a total of 9 ranked keywords, with a cumulative Estimated Traffic Value (ETV) of approximately 8.10. Notably, there is a higher concentration of keywords in the position 21-50 range, indicating potential areas for improvement in ranking strategy. The average competition for these keywords is relatively low, suggesting opportunities to enhance rankings with targeted efforts. The keyword with the highest search volume is “3dexperience,” although it is not the top-ranked keyword.

Keyword Rankings
Position Overview
    • Total Ranked Keywords: 9
    • Position 1 Keywords: 0
    • Position 2-3 Keywords: 0
    • Position 4-10 Keywords: 1
    • Position 11-20 Keywords: 1
    • Position 21-50 Keywords: 3
    • Position 50+ Keywords: 4

The data indicates a concentration of keywords within the 21-50 rank range. Only one keyword appears in the top 10, which highlights a need for strategic improvements to achieve higher rankings.

Top Performing Keywords
    • Keyword in Top 10: “prod tech” at position 7

This keyword is the only one within the top 10, suggesting it has been effectively optimised.

Search Volume and Competition
    • Highest Search Volume Keyword: “3dexperience” with a volume of 880
    • Average Competition: 0 (Based on available data)

The keyword “3dexperience” has the highest search volume, which presents an opportunity to improve its ranking. The overall low competition indicates that enhancements in content and backlink strategies could lead to better rankings.

Estimated Traffic Value (ETV) and CPC
  • Estimated Traffic Value (ETV): 8.10
  • Keywords with CPC > £1: 4

The ETV suggests moderate traffic potential from the ranked keywords. Four keywords have a Cost Per Click (CPC) greater than £1, indicating their commercial value and potential ROI from optimisation.

Recommendations for Strategy Improvement

1. Content Optimisation: Focus on improving the content quality and relevance for high search volume keywords like “3dexperience” to enhance ranking potential.

2. Backlink Strategy: Develop a targeted backlink acquisition strategy to improve domain authority and keyword rankings, particularly for keywords with moderate competition.

3. Keyword Targeting: Prioritise keywords within the 21-50 rank range for optimisation, as these are on the cusp of higher visibility and could yield significant traffic gains with focused efforts.

4. Competitor Analysis: Conduct a thorough analysis of competitor strategies for top keywords to identify successful tactics and content gaps.

5. Technical SEO: Ensure that technical aspects such as page speed, mobile friendliness, and proper use of <h1&gt and <meta&gt tags are optimised for improved search engine visibility.

Conclusion

The analysis identifies key areas for improvement in SEO strategies, particularly in enhancing keyword rankings and leveraging low competition to gain a competitive edge. By focusing on content optimisation, backlink acquisition, and strategic keyword targeting, there is potential for substantial improvements in search visibility and traffic.

Get full report

Want to know what your competitors are doing?

How do you compare to your competitors?
Get detailed market knowledge with a Competitor Insight review. See where you stand and the opportunities where you can out-perform. Identify the strengths and weaknesses of your competitor websites and take away a plan for gaining valuable search traffic.

We can only provide a limited number of Competitor Insight reviews so click below to request access to this invaluable analysis.

A Growthlabs Competitor Insight review includes:
Detailed analysis of your top 5 competitors
Review discussion with member of the Growthlabs team
Recommendations and an action plan
Only 20 Deep Dive reviews available.
Request Competitor Insight
How do you compare to competitors?
Get Competitor Insight
Curious how you stack up against your competitors?
Get a Competitor Insight review from Growthlabs to see where you stand, uncover key opportunities, and walk away with a clear plan to gain valuable search traffic. Limited to just 20 reviews—complete the form below to request yours.