Overall Summary

Summary

This report compiles an analysis of the website’s current performance, technical SEO status, keyword rankings, and technology stack. It highlights critical areas for improvement that can significantly impact performance and conversions. Key issues identified include inefficient caching, suboptimal resource loading, and SEO optimisation challenges. Implementing the provided recommendations will enhance the website’s speed, search engine visibility, and user experience. Below are the ten key findings from the analysis:

Key Findings

1. Inefficient Caching: 27 resources are not utilising long cache lifetimes, impacting repeat visit speeds. Implementing efficient cache policies can enhance performance.

2. Text Compression: Potential savings of 50 KiB were identified through text compression, which can reduce load times and improve speed.

3. SEO Content Optimisation: 87 pages lack meta descriptions, and there are instances of duplicate titles and content. Addressing these can improve search engine visibility and click-through rates.

4. Image Optimisation: Many images lack alt attributes and titles, reducing accessibility. Properly sizing and using next-gen formats can save significant data and improve load times.

5. Keyword Ranking Opportunities: High-volume keywords like “pioneer” have low rankings. Optimising content for these keywords can enhance visibility and traffic.

6. Security and HTTPS: An insecure request was found. Ensuring all resources are loaded over HTTPS is crucial for security and utilising modern web features.

7. JavaScript and CSS Optimization: High JavaScript execution time and potential savings from unused CSS/JavaScript indicate a need for optimisation to improve interactivity and loading times.

8. Technology Stack Utilisation: The use of Bootstrap and Elementor needs optimisation to prevent unnecessary loading components. Regular updates and audits of WordPress plugins are recommended.

9. Backlink Strategy: Enhancing the backlink profile by targeting high-authority sites can improve domain authority and keyword rankings.

10. Mobile Responsiveness and Performance: Ensuring mobile responsiveness and implementing performance optimisation measures like lazy loading can improve user experience across devices.

By focusing on these key areas, the website can achieve improved performance metrics, higher conversion rates, and a more robust SEO foundation.

Get full report

Overall Performance Review

Desktop Speed Performance Results
A
B
C
Mobile Speed Performance Results
A
B
C
Domain Rating Results
A
B
C
A
Industry Standard
B
Pioneer Group (UK) Performance
C
Growthlabs Clients

SEO Overview Statistics

Total Ranked Keywords
218
Keywords in #1 Position
1
Keywords in #2-3 Position
5
Keywords in #4 - #10 Position
10
Estimated Traffic Value
$1450.11
Highest Search Volume
70
Top Ranked Keyword
pioneer group stockport
Total Search Volume
0

Overall Website Statistics

Valid SSL Certificate
Canonicalization Test Passed
WWW Redirect Test Passed
4XX Errors
0
External Links
562
Internal Links
2559
Broken Links
0
Duplicate Titles
2
Duplicate Descriptions
0
Duplicate Content Instances
5
Pages Without Descriptions
87
Title Too Long
31
Title Too Short
20
Redirect Loops
0
5XX Errors
0
Broken Resources
5
SEO-Friendly URL Checks Passed
83
SEO-Friendly URL Keywords Check
86
Images With Missing Alt Attributes
80
Images Missing Image Titles
87
Summary

The website’s performance analysis reveals several areas where improvements can be made to enhance speed and user experience. Key issues include inefficient caching, suboptimal resource loading, and large network payloads. Addressing these concerns can significantly boost the site’s performance metrics such as load time, interactivity, and visual stability. Below are the detailed findings and recommendations.

Key Recommendations
Serve Static Assets with an Efficient Cache Policy
    • Issue: 27 resources are not leveraging long cache lifetimes.
    • Recommendation: Implement long cache expiration policies for static assets like images, scripts, and stylesheets. This will help speed up repeat visits by reducing the need to re-download unchanged resources.
Enable Text Compression
    • Issue: Potential savings of 50 KiB by compressing text-based resources.
    • Recommendation: Use text compression techniques such as gzip, deflate, or brotli to reduce the size of text files, which will result in faster load times.
Avoid Multiple Page Redirects
    • Issue: Redirects are causing an additional delay of 190 ms.
    • Recommendation: Minimise page redirects by updating internal links and avoiding unnecessary redirects to streamline the loading process.
Speed Index
    • Performance: Current Speed Index is 2.6 seconds.
    • Recommendation: Optimize the loading of above-the-fold content to improve how quickly the page’s contents become visible.
Eliminate Render-Blocking Resources
    • Issue: Render-blocking resources are causing a delay of 1,350 ms.
    • Recommendation: Inline critical CSS and defer non-critical JavaScript to ensure that essential content loads first.
Cumulative Layout Shift
    • Performance: CLS score is 0.281.
    • Recommendation: Ensure dimensions for all images and videos are set and avoid dynamically injected content, which causes layout shifts.
Reduce JavaScript Execution Time
    • Issue: High JavaScript execution time of 2.1 seconds.
    • Recommendation: Optimise JavaScript by splitting code, removing unused code, and using lighter libraries to reduce execution time.
First Contentful Paint
    • Performance: 1.7 seconds to first contentful paint.
    • Recommendation: Prioritise the loading of visible content to improve the time it takes for users to see the first elements on the page.
Defer Offscreen Images
    • Issue: Potential savings of 4 KiB by lazy-loading images.
    • Recommendation: Implement lazy loading for images not immediately visible to the user to reduce initial load times.
Avoid Enormous Network Payloads
    • Issue: Total network payload size is 10,303 KiB.
    • Recommendation: Reduce image sizes, compress files, and eliminate unnecessary resources to decrease total payload size.
Minimize Main-Thread Work
    • Issue: Main-thread work takes 3.3 seconds.
    • Recommendation: Reduce JavaScript parsing and execution times and minimise heavy computations on the main thread.
Time to Interactive
    • Performance: 6.2 seconds to become interactive.
    • Recommendation: Optimise the critical rendering path and reduce JavaScript execution to allow users to interact with the page faster.
Largest Contentful Paint
    • Performance: LCP is at 3.4 seconds.
    • Recommendation: Optimise larger elements like images and videos, and ensure quick resource loading to improve LCP times.
Serve Images in Next-Gen Formats
    • Issue: Potential savings of 5,110 KiB by using modern formats.
    • Recommendation: Convert images to next-generation formats like WebP or AVIF for better compression and faster loading.
Properly Size Images
    • Issue: Potential savings of 3,454 KiB by resizing images.
    • Recommendation: Ensure images are uploaded in the correct size and resolution to match their display size.
Minify and Reduce Unused CSS and JavaScript
    • Issue: Potential savings of 30 KiB by minifying and removing unused CSS and JavaScript.
    • Recommendation: Minify CSS and JavaScript files and remove any unused code to reduce the amount of data that needs to be loaded.
Reduce the Impact of Third-Party Code
    • Issue: Third-party code blocks the main thread for 640 ms.
    • Recommendation: Limit third-party scripts and load them asynchronously to minimise their impact on page performance.
Secure the Site with HTTPS
    • Issue: 1 insecure request found.
    • Recommendation: Ensure all resources are loaded over HTTPS to enhance security and enable newer web features.
Efficiently Encode Images
    • Issue: Potential savings of 393 KiB by optimising images.
    • Recommendation: Compress images using tools that maintain quality while reducing file size.
Max Potential First Input Delay
  • Performance: Measured at 320 ms.
  • Recommendation: Improve responsiveness by optimising scripts and ensuring efficient handling of user inputs.

Implementing these recommendations will enhance the website’s loading speed, interactivity, and overall user experience.

Get full report

Current Website Issues

A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. [Learn more about efficient cache policies](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/uses-long-cache-ttl/).
Text-based resources should be served with compression (gzip, deflate or brotli) to minimize total network bytes. [Learn more about text compression](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/uses-text-compression/).
Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded. [Learn how to avoid page redirects](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/redirects/).
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. [Learn more about the Speed Index metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/speed-index/).
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles. [Learn how to eliminate render-blocking resources](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/render-blocking-resources/).
Cumulative Layout Shift measures the movement of visible elements within the viewport. [Learn more about the Cumulative Layout Shift metric](https://web.dev/articles/cls).
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. [Learn how to reduce Javascript execution time](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/bootup-time/).
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. [Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/first-contentful-paint/).
Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive. [Learn how to defer offscreen images](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/offscreen-images/).
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. [Learn how to reduce payload sizes](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/total-byte-weight/).
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. [Learn how to minimize main-thread work](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/mainthread-work-breakdown/)
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. [Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/interactive/).
This is the largest contentful element painted within the viewport. [Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint element](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/lighthouse-largest-contentful-paint/)
Minifying CSS files can reduce network payload sizes. [Learn how to minify CSS](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unminified-css/).
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. [Learn how to minimize third-party impact](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/optimizing-content-efficiency/loading-third-party-javascript/).
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. [Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/lighthouse-total-blocking-time/).
Image formats like WebP and AVIF often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption. [Learn more about modern image formats](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/uses-webp-images/).
Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time. [Learn how to size images](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/uses-responsive-images/).
Reduce unused JavaScript and defer loading scripts until they are required to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn how to reduce unused JavaScript](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unused-javascript/).
All sites should be protected with HTTPS, even ones that don't handle sensitive data. This includes avoiding [mixed content](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/security/prevent-mixed-content/what-is-mixed-content), where some resources are loaded over HTTP despite the initial request being served over HTTPS. HTTPS prevents intruders from tampering with or passively listening in on the communications between your app and your users, and is a prerequisite for HTTP/2 and many new web platform APIs. [Learn more about HTTPS](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/pwa/is-on-https/).
Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data. [Learn how to efficiently encode images](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/uses-optimized-images/).
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. [Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/lighthouse-max-potential-fid/).
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. [Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/lighthouse-largest-contentful-paint/)
Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time. [Learn how to minify JavaScript](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unminified-javascript/).
Reduce unused rules from stylesheets and defer CSS not used for above-the-fold content to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn how to reduce unused CSS](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unused-css-rules/).
These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)

Techical SEO Report

Technical SEO Report for Pioneer Group
Overall Feedback Summary

The SEO health of the domain `pioneergroup.co.uk` is generally strong, with a significant on-page score of 92.25, indicating comprehensive optimisation efforts. The SSL certificate is valid, and the site effectively utilises HTTPS, which is crucial for security and SEO. Despite these strengths, there are some areas that require attention to enhance the site’s performance and user experience further. Key issues include missing descriptions, duplicate titles, and missing image alt attributes, which need addressing to improve search engine visibility and accessibility.

Domain Information and Crawl Status
    • Domain Name: pioneergroup.co.uk
    • CMS: Elementor 3.24.7
    • Server: Apache
    • IP Address: 185.151.30.140
    • SSL Certificate: Valid, issued by Let’s Encrypt
    • Crawl Start: 2024-12-12 12:03:09 +00:00
    • Crawl End: 2024-12-12 12:11:19 +00:00
    • Total Pages Crawled: 100 (Crawl limit reached)
Key Observations and Issues

1. SSL and Security

    • SSL Status: Valid, ensuring secure data transmission.
    • HTTP2 Support: Enabled, enhancing site speed and security.

2. Canonicalisation

    • Canonical Tags: Issues detected (13 pages without canonical tags).
    • Impact: Lack of canonicalisation can lead to duplicate content issues.
    • Fix: Implement canonical tags to specify the preferred version of pages.

3. Titles and Descriptions

    • Duplicate Titles: 2 instances of duplicate titles, which can confuse search engines.
    • Missing Descriptions: 87 pages lack meta descriptions, affecting click-through rates.
    • Title Length Issues: 31 titles are too long, and 20 are too short.
    • Fix: Ensure unique, concise titles and meta descriptions for each page.

4. Content and SEO

    • Duplicate Content: 5 instances detected, potentially harming SEO rankings.
    • Low Content Rate: 87 pages with low content quality.
    • Fix: Address duplicate content issues and enhance the quality of low-content pages.

5. Link Analysis

    • External Links: 562
    • Internal Links: 2559
    • Broken Links: None detected.
    • Fix: Regularly audit links to maintain site integrity.

6. Images and Media

    • Missing Alt Attributes: 80 images lack alt text, reducing accessibility.
    • Missing Image Titles: 87 images without titles.
    • Fix: Add descriptive alt text and titles to all images.

7. Performance and Speed

    • High Waiting and Loading Times: Detected on 3 pages.
    • Fix: Optimise images, leverage browser caching, and minimise JavaScript to improve load times.

8. Redirections and Errors

    • Redirect Loops: None detected.
    • 4xx/5xx Errors: No errors found, indicating stable server response.

9. URL Structure

    • SEO-Friendly URLs: 83 out of 100 URLs are SEO-friendly.
    • Fix: Review and optimise URLs for clarity and keyword relevance.
Recommendations
  • Canonicalisation: Implement appropriate canonical tags to resolve the identified issues.
  • Meta Data: Ensure all pages have unique and optimised titles and descriptions.
  • Content Quality: Improve content quality on low-content pages and resolve duplicate content issues.
  • Image Optimisation: Add missing alt text and titles to enhance accessibility and SEO.
  • Performance: Continue to monitor and optimise site speed for better user experience.
  • Regular Audits: Conduct regular SEO audits to identify and fix emerging issues promptly.
Conclusion

While `pioneergroup.co.uk` demonstrates a robust SEO foundation, addressing the outlined issues will further enhance the site’s search engine performance and user experience. Implementing the recommended fixes will help maintain competitiveness in search rankings and improve overall site usability.

Get full report

Tech Stack Report

Summary

The website under review utilises a robust and widely-used technology stack, primarily centred around WordPress and its ecosystem. Key components include front-end frameworks like Bootstrap, page builders such as Elementor, and essential JavaScript libraries. The website employs PHP for server-side programming and MySQL as its database solution. Security is bolstered by Google’s reCAPTCHA, while StackPath provides content delivery network (CDN) services. However, there are areas where improvements can be made to enhance performance, security, and future scalability.

Technology Stack Assessment and Recommendations
Web Development
    • UI Frameworks: Currently utilising Bootstrap. While Bootstrap is versatile and responsive, ensure that its usage is optimised to prevent loading unnecessary components that could slow down the site. Consider customising Bootstrap to include only the components being used.
    • Page Builders: Elementor is a popular choice for building WordPress pages with ease. Ensure that it is kept updated to leverage new features and security patches. Additionally, review Elementor’s impact on page load times and consider minimising the number of active widgets and plugins to enhance performance.
    • JavaScript Libraries:
    • jQuery & jQuery Migrate: These are widely used for compatibility with older scripts. However, if possible, consider moving to vanilla JavaScript for new features to reduce dependency and enhance performance.
    • Underscore.js: Ensure it is necessary for your current application. Modern JavaScript (ES6+) may offer similar functionalities without the need for additional libraries.
    • Programming Languages: PHP is the backbone of WordPress. Make sure the PHP version is up-to-date to benefit from performance improvements and security features.
Add-ons
    • WordPress Plugins: Elementor is a crucial part of the website’s setup. Regularly audit and update the plugins to avoid security vulnerabilities and conflicts. Consider removing any unused or redundant plugins to streamline the site.
Analytics
    • Google Analytics: This is essential for tracking user interaction. Ensure that it is configured correctly to collect the necessary data for informed decision-making. Consider exploring Google Tag Manager for easier management of tracking codes.
Security
    • reCAPTCHA: A good measure against spam and bots. Regularly review its placement and effectiveness. Consider implementing additional security measures like a web application firewall (WAF) or security-focused plugins to further protect the site.
Servers
    • CDN: StackPath is a reliable CDN option. Confirm that it is configured correctly to cache assets effectively, reducing server load and improving user experience. Regularly review CDN analytics to optimise performance.
    • Databases: MySQL is the standard for WordPress sites. Ensure regular database optimisation and backups are in place. Consider using caching plugins or tools like Redis or Memcached to improve database query performance.
Content
  • CMS and Blogs: Utilising WordPress for both CMS and blogging is a strong choice. Ensure that themes and plugins are compatible with the latest WordPress version. Regularly update content for SEO benefits and engage with the audience effectively.
Additional Recommendations

1. Performance Optimisation: Consider implementing lazy loading for images and asynchronous loading for scripts to improve page load times. Utilise tools like Google PageSpeed Insights to identify other areas for improvement.

2. SEO Enhancements: Ensure that best practices for on-page SEO are followed, including the use of appropriate <h1> tags, meta descriptions, and alt attributes for images.

3. Mobile Responsiveness: With Bootstrap, ensure that the site remains fully responsive and provides a seamless experience across all devices.

By addressing these recommendations, the website can improve its performance, security, and user experience, ultimately leading to better engagement and satisfaction from visitors.

Get full report

SEO Report

Summary

This report provides an in-depth analysis of the current SEO status, focusing on keyword rankings, search volumes, competition levels, and backlink strategies. The objective is to identify strengths and weaknesses in the current SEO strategy and suggest improvements to enhance visibility and traffic.

Keyword Rankings Overview
    • Total Ranked Keywords: 218
    • Position 1 Keywords: 1
    • Position 2-3 Keywords: 5
    • Position 4-10 Keywords: 10
    • Position 11-20 Keywords: 31
    • Position 21-50 Keywords: 79
    • Position 50+ Keywords: 92

This distribution shows a strong presence in the top 10 positions for a limited number of keywords, with a large proportion of keywords ranking below position 20. This indicates potential areas for improvement in keyword optimization.

Top Performing Keywords
    • Top Ranked Keyword: “pioneer group stockport” with an estimated traffic value (ETV) of 21.28 and a search volume of 70.
    • Keywords with High Search Volume: The keyword “pioneer” has the highest search volume at 27,100 but ranks only in position 18, highlighting a significant opportunity to improve its ranking.
Competition and Traffic Analysis
  • Estimated Traffic Value (ETV): 1450.11
  • Average Competition: The competition level across keywords varies, with several keywords having low competition, indicating opportunities for growth.
  • Keywords with CPC > £1: 19 keywords, indicating a substantial number of keywords with high commercial intent.
SEO Strengths

1. High Ranking for Specific Keywords: The keyword “pioneer group stockport” ranks first, which is a significant achievement.
2. Potential High-Value Keywords: Keywords such as “fan zones” and “immersive audio visual” have substantial search volumes and relatively low competition, suggesting potential for increased traffic.

SEO Weaknesses

1. High Volume Keywords with Low Rankings: Despite substantial search volumes, several keywords, like “pioneer,” are not ranking well, indicating a need for targeted strategies to improve their positions.
2. Limited Top 3 Rankings: Only a few keywords are ranking within the top 3 positions, suggesting room for optimization in content and backlink strategies.

Strategic Recommendations

1. Content Optimization: Focus on optimizing content for high search volume keywords, particularly those with low competition, to improve rankings and drive more traffic.
2. Backlink Acquisition: Enhance the backlink profile by targeting high-authority sites related to the industry. This can help improve domain authority and keyword rankings.
3. Technical SEO Improvements: Conduct a thorough technical SEO audit to address any issues that may be hindering search engine crawling and indexing.
4. Focused Keyword Strategy: Prioritize keywords with high commercial value and low competition for content creation and optimization efforts.

By addressing these areas, the overall SEO performance can be significantly enhanced, leading to improved search visibility and increased organic traffic.

Get full report

Want to know what your competitors are doing?

How do you compare to your competitors?
Get detailed market knowledge with a Competitor Insight review. See where you stand and the opportunities where you can out-perform. Identify the strengths and weaknesses of your competitor websites and take away a plan for gaining valuable search traffic.

We can only provide a limited number of Competitor Insight reviews so click below to request access to this invaluable analysis.

A Growthlabs Competitor Insight review includes:
Detailed analysis of your top 5 competitors
Review discussion with member of the Growthlabs team
Recommendations and an action plan
Only 20 Deep Dive reviews available.
Request Competitor Insight
How do you compare to competitors?
Get Competitor Insight
Curious how you stack up against your competitors?
Get a Competitor Insight review from Growthlabs to see where you stand, uncover key opportunities, and walk away with a clear plan to gain valuable search traffic. Limited to just 20 reviews—complete the form below to request yours.