Overall Summary

Summary of Key Aspects Impacting Performance and Conversions

The examined website reveals several areas with significant potential for improvement in both performance and conversion rates. Addressing these key findings can lead to enhanced user experience and higher search engine rankings.

Introduction

The overall analysis of the website’s performance metrics, technical SEO, and technology stack highlights both strengths and weaknesses. By focusing on the critical areas identified in this report, the website can achieve better loading times, improved interactivity, and increased search engine visibility.

Key Findings

1. Image Optimisation: Transitioning to next-gen image formats like WebP or AVIF could significantly reduce download sizes, improving page speed and user experience.

2. Render-Blocking Resources: Deliver critical JavaScript and CSS inline, while deferring non-critical resources, to accelerate the loading process.

3. Server Response Time: Optimising server configurations to reduce Time to First Byte (TTFB) will enhance the overall speed of the site.

4. Caching Strategy: Implementing long cache lifetimes for static assets can improve load times for repeat visitors, enhancing user experience.

5. Technical SEO Health: Addressing broken links, missing <h1> tags, and duplicate content will improve the site’s SEO performance and user navigation.

6. Keyword Strategy: Focusing on improving rankings for existing keywords and expanding the keyword portfolio can increase organic visibility and traffic.

7. JavaScript and CSS Management: Reducing unused JavaScript and CSS can lead to faster load times and a more responsive user interface.

8. Modernising Technology Stack: Evaluating alternative web servers like Nginx or LiteSpeed and updating JavaScript libraries can improve site performance.

9. Backlink Profile Enhancement: Strengthening the backlink profile with high-quality, relevant links can boost domain authority and search rankings.

10. Content Management: Regular updates to WordPress core, themes, and plugins, along with the use of a CDN, can enhance security, performance, and content delivery speed.

By implementing these recommendations, the website can achieve significant improvements in performance and conversion rates, leading to a more competitive position in search engine results and an enhanced user experience.

Get full report

Overall Performance Review

Desktop Speed Performance Results
A
B
C
Mobile Speed Performance Results
A
B
C
Domain Rating Results
A
B
C
A
Industry Standard
B
Greater London Cradles Performance
C
Growthlabs Clients

SEO Overview Statistics

Total Ranked Keywords
3
Keywords in #1 Position
0
Keywords in #2-3 Position
1
Keywords in #4 - #10 Position
0
Estimated Traffic Value
$15.13
Highest Search Volume
0
Top Ranked Keyword
Total Search Volume
0

Overall Website Statistics

Valid SSL Certificate
Canonicalization Test Passed
WWW Redirect Test Passed
4XX Errors
9
External Links
32
Internal Links
737
Broken Links
12
Duplicate Titles
0
Duplicate Descriptions
0
Duplicate Content Instances
2
Pages Without Descriptions
1
Title Too Long
0
Title Too Short
0
Redirect Loops
0
5XX Errors
0
Broken Resources
2
SEO-Friendly URL Checks Passed
23
SEO-Friendly URL Keywords Check
23
Images With Missing Alt Attributes
23
Images Missing Image Titles
23
Performance Summary

The website exhibits a range of performance metrics that indicate both strengths and areas for improvement. The key performance indicators reveal that while some aspects such as the Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) and First Contentful Paint (FCP) are relatively efficient, there are critical areas that could significantly enhance the overall speed and interactivity of the site. These include addressing render-blocking resources, optimizing the server response time, and reducing unused JavaScript and CSS. By implementing the recommendations outlined below, the website can achieve faster loading times and a more efficient user experience.

Key Recommendations
Serve Images in Next-Gen Formats
    • Issue: The current use of traditional image formats like JPEG and PNG could be hampering download speeds.
    • Solution: Transition to next-gen formats like WebP or AVIF, which offer better compression. This change could result in potential savings of approximately 27 KiB.
Speed Index and Loading Times
    • Speed Index (4.0 s): Indicates the speed at which content is visually displayed.
    • Largest Contentful Paint (1.8 s): The time taken to render the largest visible element is within an acceptable range, but improvements can be made.
    • Recommendations: Focus on streamlining render-blocking resources and enhancing server response times to improve these metrics.
Eliminate Render-Blocking Resources
    • Issue: Resources blocking the first paint delay the rendering of the page.
    • Solution: Deliver critical JavaScript/CSS inline and defer non-critical scripts/styles to save approximately 320 ms.
Optimize Server Response Time
    • Issue: The server response time for the main document is 1,740 ms.
    • Solution: Optimize server configurations and reduce server load to improve the Time to First Byte (TTFB) and overall response time.
Enhance Caching Strategies
    • Issue: Static assets are not served with an efficient cache policy, affecting repeat visits.
    • Solution: Implement long cache lifetimes for these resources to speed up subsequent visits.
Reduce Unused CSS and JavaScript
    • Unused CSS: Potential savings of 99 KiB can be achieved by eliminating unused styles.
    • Unused JavaScript: Potential savings of 186 KiB by reducing and deferring JavaScript that isn’t critical for initial load.
Improve Interactivity and Main-Thread Work
    • Time to Interactive (2.6 s): The time for the page to become fully interactive can be reduced.
    • Main-Thread Work (2.4 s): Reducing the time spent on parsing, compiling, and executing JavaScript can enhance performance.
    • Solution: Focus on minimizing main-thread work by optimizing JavaScript payloads and execution.
Avoid Serving Legacy JavaScript
    • Issue: Serving legacy JavaScript scripts to modern browsers increases load time.
    • Solution: Use a modern script deployment strategy to avoid unnecessary polyfills and transform codes, potentially saving 27 KiB.
Defer Offscreen Images
    • Issue: Offscreen images are loaded unnecessarily, impacting time to interactivity.
    • Solution: Implement lazy-loading for offscreen images, leading to potential savings of 82 KiB.
Manage DOM Size
  • Issue: A large DOM with 1,250 elements can cause increased memory usage and layout reflows.
  • Solution: Simplify and optimise the DOM structure to improve performance.

By addressing these recommendations, the website’s performance can be significantly improved, leading to a faster and more responsive user experience.

Get full report

Current Website Issues

Image formats like WebP and AVIF often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption. [Learn more about modern image formats](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/uses-webp-images/).
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. [Learn more about the Speed Index metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/speed-index/).
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. [Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/lighthouse-largest-contentful-paint/)
This is the largest contentful element painted within the viewport. [Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint element](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/lighthouse-largest-contentful-paint/)
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. [Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/lighthouse-total-blocking-time/).
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles. [Learn how to eliminate render-blocking resources](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/render-blocking-resources/).
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. [Learn more about efficient cache policies](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/uses-long-cache-ttl/).
Keep the server response time for the main document short because all other requests depend on it. [Learn more about the Time to First Byte metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/time-to-first-byte/).
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. [Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/interactive/).
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. For your bundled JavaScript, adopt a modern script deployment strategy using module/nomodule feature detection to reduce the amount of code shipped to modern browsers, while retaining support for legacy browsers. [Learn how to use modern JavaScript](https://web.dev/articles/publish-modern-javascript)
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. [Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/first-contentful-paint/).
Reduce unused rules from stylesheets and defer CSS not used for above-the-fold content to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn how to reduce unused CSS](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unused-css-rules/).
Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive. [Learn how to defer offscreen images](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/offscreen-images/).
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. [Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/lighthouse-max-potential-fid/).
A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer [style calculations](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/rendering/reduce-the-scope-and-complexity-of-style-calculations), and produce costly [layout reflows](https://developers.google.com/speed/articles/reflow). [Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/dom-size/).
Reduce unused JavaScript and defer loading scripts until they are required to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. [Learn how to reduce unused JavaScript](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/unused-javascript/).
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. [Learn how to minimize main-thread work](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/mainthread-work-breakdown/)

Techical SEO Report

Technical SEO Report for www.greaterlondoncradles.com
Overall Feedback Summary

The technical SEO crawl of www.greaterlondoncradles.com has identified several key areas requiring improvement to enhance search engine visibility and user experience. The website’s performance is hampered by issues such as broken links, missing <h1> tags, and content-related problems, which contribute to a low on-page score of 61.51. Addressing these issues will significantly improve the site’s SEO health and potentially increase its ranking.

Crawl Summary
    • Pages Crawled: 32 out of a maximum of 100
    • Total Internal Links: 737
    • Total External Links: 32
    • SSL Status: Valid
    • HTTP/2: Not supported
    • Canonicalization: Not properly implemented
    • On-page Score: 61.51
Key Issues and Fixes

1. Broken Links

    • Impact: Broken links can lead to a poor user experience and negatively affect search engine rankings.
    • Specific Fixes: Identify and update or remove all broken links. Consider setting up 301 redirects where appropriate.

2. Missing <h1> Tags

    • Impact: The absence of <h1> tags on 8 pages can hinder search engines from understanding the main topic of the page.
    • Specific Fixes: Ensure each page has a unique <h1> tag that accurately represents the page content.

3. Duplicate Content

    • Impact: Duplicate content can confuse search engines and dilute the page’s ranking potential.
    • Specific Fixes: Consolidate duplicate content and implement canonical tags to guide search engines to the preferred version.

4. Missing Image Alt Texts

    • Impact: Missing alt texts on 23 images can impair accessibility and the site’s ability to rank for image searches.
    • Specific Fixes: Add descriptive alt texts to all images to improve accessibility and search engine indexing.

5. High Waiting and Loading Times

    • Impact: Slow page load times can result in higher bounce rates and lower search engine rankings.
    • Specific Fixes: Optimise images, leverage browser caching, and minimise JavaScript and CSS files to improve load times.

6. Low Content Rate

    • Impact: Thin content can lead to low user engagement and poor search rankings.
    • Specific Fixes: Enhance content quality by providing more detailed, informative, and relevant information on affected pages.

7. HTTPS to HTTP Links

    • Impact: Links from HTTPS to HTTP can cause security warnings and affect user trust.
    • Specific Fixes: Update all links to use HTTPS to ensure a secure browsing experience.

8. 4xx Errors

    • Impact: 4xx errors indicate pages that are not found, which can disrupt user navigation and crawl efficiency.
    • Specific Fixes: Fix or redirect pages resulting in 4xx errors to maintain a smooth user journey.

9. No Canonical Tags

    • Impact: Absence of canonical tags can lead to duplicate content issues.
    • Specific Fixes: Implement canonical tags to specify the preferred version of a page to search engines.
Additional Checks
  • Robots.txt: Present and functional
  • Sitemap: Available
  • Server: Apache
  • SSL Information: Valid certificate issued by Let’s Encrypt, expiring on 5th March 2025.

By addressing the highlighted issues with the specific fixes provided, www.greaterlondoncradles.com can improve its technical SEO health, leading to better search engine performance and enhanced user experience.

Get full report

Tech Stack Report

Summary of Technology Stack Assessment

The website employs a robust and widely-used technology stack, leveraging WordPress as its content management system (CMS) with Elementor as a page builder. It utilises Apache HTTP Server for web hosting and MySQL for database management, which are both reliable and well-supported technologies. JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and font scripts from Typekit are used to enhance the frontend experience. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics purposes, and CookieYes is implemented for cookie compliance. Recommendations include considering alternative web servers for improved performance, updating JavaScript libraries, and exploring additional security measures.

Web Servers
    • Current Technology: Apache HTTP Server
    • Recommendation: Consider evaluating Nginx or LiteSpeed as alternative web servers. These alternatives can offer better performance, especially under high traffic conditions, due to their efficient handling of concurrent connections and static content delivery.
Databases
    • Current Technology: MySQL
    • Recommendation: MySQL is a solid choice, but reviewing configurations and ensuring regular updates can enhance performance and security. Consider exploring MariaDB, a MySQL-compatible alternative, known for its improved performance and open-source community support.
Cookie Compliance
    • Current Technology: CookieYes
    • Recommendation: Ensure that CookieYes is configured correctly to comply with the latest privacy regulations, such as GDPR and CCPA. Regular updates and audits of the cookie policy and consent management are advisable.
Page Builders
    • Current Technology: Elementor
    • Recommendation: Elementor is a powerful page builder, but ensure that it is kept updated to its latest version to benefit from new features and security patches. Evaluate the use of additional plugins for optimization without overburdening server resources.
JavaScript Libraries
    • Current Technology: jQuery
    • Recommendation: While jQuery is still widely used, consider progressively migrating to native JavaScript or modern frameworks like React or Vue.js for enhanced performance and maintainability. This can lead to improved loading times and a better user experience.
Font Scripts
    • Current Technology: Typekit
    • Recommendation: Ensure performance optimizations are in place for font loading to prevent it from becoming a bottleneck. Explore alternatives like Google Fonts, which may offer more flexibility and reduced latency.
Programming Languages
    • Current Technology: PHP
    • Recommendation: PHP is a standard choice for WordPress websites. Regular updates to the latest stable PHP version are crucial for security and performance improvements. Consider using PHP 8.x for its significant performance enhancements over previous versions.
WordPress Plugins
    • Current Technology: Elementor
    • Recommendation: Regularly audit and update all plugins to ensure compatibility and security. Minimize the use of plugins to those strictly necessary to reduce potential vulnerabilities and improve loading times.
Analytics
    • Current Technologies: Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
    • Recommendation: Regularly review analytics configurations to ensure accurate data collection. Consider implementing server-side tracking to improve data reliability and reduce dependency on third-party cookies.
Content Management and Blogs
  • Current Technology: WordPress
  • Recommendation: WordPress is an excellent choice for content management. Regular updates to both the core system and themes are essential for maintaining security and performance. Consider using a content delivery network (CDN) to enhance content delivery speed globally.

By following these recommendations, the website can achieve better performance, security, and maintainability, while ensuring compliance with current standards and best practices.

Get full report

SEO Report

Summary

The SEO analysis highlights the strengths and weaknesses in current search engine performance, focusing on keyword rankings, search volumes, competition, and potential strategies for improvement. The analysis identifies a limited number of ranked keywords with moderate to low search volumes and competition. There is significant room for growth, particularly by improving rankings for lower-positioned keywords and expanding the keyword portfolio to increase visibility and traffic.

Keyword Rankings
    • Total Ranked Keywords: 3
    • Position Distribution:
    • Position 1 Keywords: 0
    • Position 2-3 Keywords: 1
    • Position 4-10 Keywords: 0
    • Position 11-20 Keywords: 0
    • Position 21-50 Keywords: 0
    • Position 50+ Keywords: 2

The keyword “cradles construction” ranks the highest at position 2, offering potential to secure the top ranking with targeted optimisation. The other keywords, “cradle construction” and “cradle news,” are positioned beyond 50, indicating a need for strategic focus to improve their rankings.

Keywords and Search Volume
    • Total Search Volume: 0 (based on available data)
    • Highest Search Volume: 170 for “cradle news”

The keywords currently targeted have relatively low search volumes. Increasing the number of keywords with higher search volumes can contribute to greater traffic inflow.

Competition
    • Average Competition: 0

The competition level for the analysed keywords is minimal, suggesting an opportunity to improve rankings with effective SEO strategies.

Estimated Traffic Value (ETV)
    • ETV: 15.126

Despite the limited number of ranked keywords, the estimated traffic value signals potential growth in traffic, particularly with improvements in keyword positioning.

Backlinks

While backlink data is not provided, enhancing the backlink profile can significantly boost domain authority and improve keyword rankings. Focus on acquiring high-quality, relevant backlinks to strengthen SEO efforts.

Strategies for Improvement

1. Optimise Content for Highest-Ranking Keywords:

    • Concentrate efforts on improving the rank of “cradles construction” to capture the top position, leveraging on-page SEO techniques like optimising <h1> and <meta> tags, content quality, and internal linking.

2. Target Keywords with High Search Volume:

    • Expand the keyword list to include terms with higher search volumes to increase organic reach and traffic potential.

3. Improve Low-Ranking Keywords:

    • Develop targeted strategies to improve the rankings of “cradle construction” and “cradle news,” such as enhancing content relevancy and focusing on competitive analysis.

4. Enhance Backlink Profile:

    • Pursue quality backlinks from authoritative sites to bolster domain authority and improve search rankings across targeted keywords.

5. Monitor and Adjust Strategies:

  • Regularly audit SEO performance to identify new opportunities and adjust strategies based on evolving search trends and competitive insights.

By implementing these strategic recommendations, there is potential to significantly enhance SEO performance, increase keyword visibility, and drive more organic traffic to the site.

Get full report

Want to know what your competitors are doing?

How do you compare to your competitors?
Get detailed market knowledge with a Competitor Insight review. See where you stand and the opportunities where you can out-perform. Identify the strengths and weaknesses of your competitor websites and take away a plan for gaining valuable search traffic.

We can only provide a limited number of Competitor Insight reviews so click below to request access to this invaluable analysis.

A Growthlabs Competitor Insight review includes:
Detailed analysis of your top 5 competitors
Review discussion with member of the Growthlabs team
Recommendations and an action plan
Only 20 Deep Dive reviews available.
Request Competitor Insight
How do you compare to competitors?
Get Competitor Insight
Curious how you stack up against your competitors?
Get a Competitor Insight review from Growthlabs to see where you stand, uncover key opportunities, and walk away with a clear plan to gain valuable search traffic. Limited to just 20 reviews—complete the form below to request yours.